686 So. 2d 267
Decided November 27, 1996
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1996-11-27
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2000
4 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“we do not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals' opinion.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Ex Parte Dorough
Relies on Horsley v. Horsley
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1996-11-27
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶2In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, we do not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals' opinion.Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).
¶3WRIT DENIED.
¶4MADDOX, ALMON, HOUSTON, SHORES, KENNEDY, COOK, and BUTTS, JJ., concur.