Tuck v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““[0]nce this court remanded the matter for a trial de novo on the issue of transfer, further judicial action on that indictment became inappropriate. See, Bragg v. State, 453 So.2d 756 (Ala.Cr.App.1984). The circuit court lost its jurisdiction upon our remand of the appeal. Because our remand order stayed any further proceeding in circuit court on this matter, the circuit court had no jurisdiction to proceed from the indictment to trial of the petitioner. See, D.L.S. v. State, 659 So.2d 1012 (Ala.Cr.App.1995); D.M.J. v. State, 589 So.2d 802 (Ala.Cr.App.1991); Bragg, supra. ... Because the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to proceed to trial on this case when it did, we must grant the petitioner’s Rule 32 petition.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Tuck