Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 686 So. 2d 621 - State v. Raleigh

686 So. 2d 621 - State v. Raleigh’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2019

5 state decisions

20199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Keyes v. Huckleberry House · 477 So. 2d 544 - Winfield v. Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering · Keyes v. Huckleberry House · 551 So. 2d 1186 - In re T.W. · 590 So. 2d 404 - Schmitt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t cannot be of any constitutional or logical significance to the child victim if the perpetrator is only seventeen-sixteen ... or ten”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is evident beyond all doubt that any type of [adult] sexual conduct involving a child constitutes an intrusion upon the rights of that child, whether or not the child consents[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “just some of the obvious reasons why the legislature has determined this defense cannot apply in such cases”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.