Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 686 SO2D 682 - State v. Baldwin

State v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2016

16 state decisions

80199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Mendenhall · Florida v. Bostick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to prevent arbitrary and oppressive interference by enforcement officials with the privacy and personal security of individuals,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “will not trigger Fourth Amendment scrutiny unless it loses its consensual nature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.