Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 686 So. 2d 689 - Tory v. State

686 So. 2d 689 - Tory v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2017

20 state decisions

130199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New Jersey v. New York · Delta Airlines, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance · Koehler v. Engle · State v. Beasley · 668 So. 2d 589 - State v. Hart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “You will live without violating the law. A conviction in a court of law shall not be necessary for such a violation to constitute a violation of your probation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Drug offender probation status shall include surveillance and random drug testing, and may include those measures normally associated with community control, except that specific treatment conditions and other treatment approaches necessary to monitor the population may be ordered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]here the record demonstrates that during the oral pronouncement of sentence, the trial judge made inconsistent statements, the matter must be remanded to the trial court to clarify the sentence imposed and to enter such corrected sentencing orders as may be appropriate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.