Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 686 SO2D 721 - Pearson v. State

Pearson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently May 2017

23 state decisions

100199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 655 So. 2d 111 - Reyes v. State · Nguyen v. State · 620 So. 2d 1304 - Skaggs v. State · Brown v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court does not have jurisdiction to hold a restitution hearing or enter an order of restitution after a notice of appeal has been filed, even though the trial court may have previously ordered restitution and reserved jurisdiction only as to the amount.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.