Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 686 SO2D 735 - Hernandez v. State

Hernandez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2014

11 state decisions

60199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Alimeg, Inc. v. Shlim · Melbourne v. State · 522 So. 2d 18 - State v. Slappy · 613 So. 2d 1301 - Files v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] mere recitation of a juror’s occupation in many cases would not be sufficient to state a facially race-neutral reason. Because almost every potential juror works, either in the home or outside the home, there is a real risk that occupation could be used pretextually as a “facially” race-neutral reason to strike practically any juror.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If there is a genuine reason why a party would fear that a particular juror's occupation would influence the juror's reasoning and cause the juror to view the case unfavorably from the party's perspective, then the occupation can be the foundation of a facially race-neutral reason to exercise a peremptory challenge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “There is no indication [in the record] that the trial court regarded Mr. Hernandez's explanation [for strike] as disingenuous”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.