¶1We find no error in the lower court’s conclusion that appellant is obliged to pay a downward adjustment of the applicable child support guidelines amount. A “change of circumstances” adequate to support the order is manifest from a comparison of the existing stipulation, which has no provision for ongoing monetary support in any amount, and the guidelines.
¶2AFFIRMED.
¶3. We do not address appellant's URESA issues because they are moot in light of our conclusion that the requisite “change of circumstances” required under Florida law is present and because they were not properly preserved by presentation to the court below.