Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 686 SW2D 140 - Cotton v. State

Cotton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Ex Parte Anderson (1995), Smith v. State (1987)

47 state decisions

1501985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Thornhill v. Alabama · United States v. Harriss · Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must guess as to its meaning and differ as to its application lacks the first essential of due process. A law must be sufficiently definite that its terms and provisions may be known, understood and applied; otherwise, it is void and unenforceable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.