Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 686 S.W.2d 605 - Logan v. Mullis

Logan v. Mullis’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

1 district · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Low (2002), Hernandez Ex Rel. Emeterio v. Tokai Corp. (1999)

1 district · 44 state decisions

2101985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana))

Relationships

Relies on Maryland Casualty Co. v. Sosa · Ewing, Ind. Exs. v. Wm. L. Foley, Inc. · O'Neal v. Quilter · Hutchins v. Masterson · Fenlon v. Jaffee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [T]he mode and sufficiency of annexation, either real or constructive; (2) the adaptation of the article to the use or purpose of the realty; and (3) the intention of the party who annexed the chattel to the realty.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The right of way, easement, rights and privileges herein granted shall be used only for the purpose of providing pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress between the paved highway lying West of the Grantors’ property mentioned above and the property of Grantee which adjoins the property of Grantors to the East. It is agreed that the Grantee will build a fence along one side of the said easement as agreed with the Grantors, and further that the Grantors, their heirs and assigns, and the agents, invitees and guests of the Grantors, their heirs or assigns may also use the road way built and to be built by the Grantee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.