Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 687 F.2d 1 - United States v. Chamorro

United States v. Chamorro’s Empirical Analysis

687 F.2d 1 · 1982

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2012 · most notably Hudson v. Palmer (1984), United States v. Sepulveda (1993)

26 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

2301982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1716

Relies on Katz v. United States · Wolff v. McDonnell · Bell v. Wolfish · Procunier v. Martinez · Meachum v. Fano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[TJhe view once held that an inmate is a mere slave is now totally rejected. The restraints and the punishment which a criminal conviction entails do not place the citizen beyond the ethical tradition that accords respect to the dignity and intrinsic worth of every individual. * s¡: * # ‡ Unquestionably, entry into a controlled environment entails a dramatic loss of privacy. Moreover, the justifiable reasons for invading an inmate’s privacy are both obvious and easily established. We are persuaded, however, that the surrender of privacy is not total and that some residuum meriting the protection of the Fourth Amendment survives the transfer into custody.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]ny inquiry into the constitutionality of security measures employed in a penal institution must begin with the premise that “prison administrators should be accorded wide-ranging deference in the adoption and execution of policies and practices that in their judgment are needed to preserve internal order and discipline and to maintain institutional security.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[m]otions for mistrials are directed primarily to the discretion of the trial court, United States v. Pappas, 611 F.2d 399 , 406 (1st Cir.1979), and 'will not be reversed absent abuse of discretion,' id. at 406, citing United States v. Sclamo, 578 F.2d 888 , 891 (1st Cir.1978).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.