Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 687 F.2d 197 - Sutter v. Groen

Sutter v. Groen’s Empirical Analysis

687 F.2d 197 · 1982

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
September 1999
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman · Marine Bank v. Weaver · Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,614 the Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Touche Ross & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The term 'security' means any note, stock, treasury stock, bond, debenture, evidence of indebtedness, certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement, . . . investment contract, voting-trust certificate, . . . or, in general, any interest or instrument commonly known as a 'security.' " 15 U.S.C. § 77b(1). 35 See also ante , at 686, n. 1. Congress presumably adopted this sweeping definition "to prevent the financial community from evading regulation by inventing new types of financial instruments rather than to prevent the courts from interpreting the Act in light of its purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “means any note, stock, treasury stock, bond, debenture, evidence of indebtedness, certificate of interest or participation in any profit-sharing agreement, collateral-trust certificate, preorganization certificate or subscription, transferable share, investment contract, voting-trust certificate, certificate of deposit for a security, fractional undivided interest in oil, gas, or other mineral rights, or, in general, any interest or instrument commonly known as a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “justify expanding liability to reach substantive evils far outside the scope of the legislature's concern.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.