Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 687 F.2d 450 - In re Katz

In re Katz’s Empirical Analysis

687 F.2d 450 · 1982

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Invitrogen Corporation v. Biocrest Manufacturing Lp (2005), Quad Environmental Technologies Corporation v. Union Sanitary District Apt (1991)

5 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1201982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 102

Relies on Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · In re Land · Gaffney v. Cummings Et Al. · In re Facius · In re Schlittler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person shall be entitled to a patent unless— ****** (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) the invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A person shall be entitled to a patent unless— (g) before the applicant’s invention thereof the invention was made, in this country by another who had not abandoned, suppressed, or concealed it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.