Gulliver v. Dalsheim’s Empirical Analysis
687 F.2d 655 · 1982
Citation profile
41
cited by 41 later decisions
September 1996
most recently cited
21 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Wainwright v. Sykes · Rose v. Lundy · Brown v. Allen · Engle v. Isaac
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted unless it appears that the applicant has exhausted the remedies available in the courts of the State, or that there is either an absence of available State corrective process or the existence of circumstanc es rendering such process ineffective to protect the rights of the prisoner. (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matlock v. Rose“On remand, the district court should determine whether Gulliver has amended his petition to delete his unexhausted claims and, if he has not, the courts should give him an opportunity to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.