Structural Systems, Inc. v. Sulfaro’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1819 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Relies on Farina v. Mission Investment Trust · Federal Deposit Insurance v. de Jesus Velez · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Otero · In Re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To the contrary, the FDIC’s petition for removal could only be characterized as premature. A removal petition brought under 12 U.S.C. § 1819 (4) is timely if filed within thirty days after the FDIC becomes a party. Otero, 598 F.2d at 633, n. 7 . In this case, the petition was filed before the FDIC formally became a party-”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Savoy v. White“formal intervention or substitution of the FDIC prior to the petition for removal ... is not necessary to support jurisdiction under 12 U.S.C. § 1819(4)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.