Corbett v. FIRSTLINE SECURITY, INC.’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Ltd. Partnership · Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under New York law, the benefits and burdens of contracts are freely assumed or assigned absent a contractual provision to the contrary”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under New York law, contracts are freely assignable absent language which expressly prohibits assignment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.