Reed v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2010
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lord Electric Co. v. United States · Holm v. United States · Osborne v. Brown · Utility Contractors, Inc. v. United States · Legg v. United Markets International, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An important body of psychological research undermines the lay intuition that confident memories of salient experiences ... are accurate... [T]he mere fact that we remember something with great confidence is not a powerful warrant for thinking it true * * * [A]ccuracy of recollection is not highly correlated with the recollector's confidence[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[the concept that eyewitness identification is flawed or subject to serious question in a particular instance may be placed within the jury's realm of understanding by careful cross-examination and by counsel's argument to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Farris v. State“[wlhile expert testimony is surely helpful in many cases, it will be truly necessary in far fewer instances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Farris v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.