State v. Wilkins’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Nichols v. United States · Baldasar v. Illinois · State v. Pexa · State v. Cooper · State v. Tovar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Wilkins argues that, because the result in our Cooper case was premised in part on “our own view of the importance of counsel,” see 343 N.W.2d at 486 , we should continue to follow that precedent. Cooper was commenting on an interpretation of the Sixth Amendment of the federal constitution in which only four justices joined. Consequently, we believe that the reference to our view of the matter was intended as an affirmation of the vieiu of the Sixth Amendment expressed by the justices in the Supreme Court’s plurality opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Allen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.