Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 687 P2D 1329 - Asplin v. Mueller

Asplin v. Mueller’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2018

16 state decisions

501984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. California · Baxter v. Palmigiano · Lefkowitz v. Turley · Lefkowitz v. Cunningham · Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “€œ[A] party to a civil proceeding may be called for testimony even if he will be claiming the privilege. If he declines to answer certain questions on Fifth Amendment grounds, it is not error to require him to invoke the privilege in the presence of the jury; and, in that event, instructions [that the jury can draw an adverse inference] are appropriate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[f]ailure of a party who is present at the trial to answer questions based on the privilege against self-incrimination raises a strong inference that the answers would have been unfavorable and damaging to him, and comment to that effect is proper.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “€œ[T]he Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.