Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 687 P2D 496 - Fountain v. Mojo

Fountain v. Mojo’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

2 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2024

2 district · 18 state decisions

7019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Page v. Clark · Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'n · Western United Realty, Inc. v. Isaacs · Intern. Tech. Instruments v. Eng. Measure. · 29 Colo. App. 205 - McNichols v. CONEJOS-K CORPORATION

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to show that the words uttered have caused injury to the plaintiff, it is generally necessary to aver and show that they were uttered pending some treaty or public action for the sale of the property, and that thereby some intending purchaser was prevented from bidding or competing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.