Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 687 P2D 897 - Canaday v. State

Canaday v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Argersinger v. Hamlin · Coleman v. Alabama · Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado · Ward v. Village of Monroeville · Strong v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The judge’s major function is to determine which of two espoused view-points — the [defense] attorney’s or the prosecutor’s — is applicable to the facts of the case before him. An unbiased and reasonably intelligent person should be able to choose fairly between such espoused viewpoints. Fairness in this context is not critically dependent upon the judge being a member of the bar; a judge must have wisdom and common sense which are at least as dependable as an education in guaranteeing the defendant a fair trial. As with district court judges, as a last resort the appellate process is able to correct the mistakes of law of a municipal court judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.