Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

687 So. 2d 327

Docket No. 96-3146.

Wickline v. State

Eugene WICKLINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 31, 1997.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-01-31

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2006

5 state decisions

Relies on 639 So. 2d 1050 - Nowlin v. State · Butchek v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-01-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Giselle Lylen Rivera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶2PER CURIAM.

¶3Eugene Wickline challenges an order denying his motion, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm but certify conflict to the Florida Supreme Court.

¶4This court has previously held that the issue raised by appellant in his motion, i.e., whether the trial court established a factual basis for this plea (specifically, whether he was in actual possession of the firearm during the commission of the crime), and as a result, erroneously imposed a three-year minimum mandatory sentence, is not cognizable in proceedings brought pursuant to rule 3.800(a). Nowlin v. State,639 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We acknowledge that the Second District Court of Appeal has held to the contrary in Butchek v. State,686 So.2d 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). Pursuant to Article V, section 3(b)(3), of the Florida Constitution, we certify conflict with this decision.

¶5Appellant's second point is without merit.

¶6AFFIRMED.

¶7MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

/687/so2d/327 · .json · Public domain