687 So. 2d 465 - State v. MacKey’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
February 2003
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · Castor v. United States · State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King · 345 So. 2d 452 - State v. Linkletter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that state of mind which exists when the circumstances indicate that the offender actively desired the prescribed criminal consequences to follow his act or failure to act.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[S]pecific criminal intent need not be proven as fact but may be inferred from the circumstances of the case and actions of the defendant. State v. Mackey, 96-817 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/96) ; 687 So.2d 465 , writ denied, 97-1814 (La.3/13/98); 712 So.2d 865 ; State v. Clark, 93-1470 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/5/94) ; 643 So.2d 463 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jackson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.