Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

687 So. 2d 71

Olson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 5, 1997

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-02-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1999

1 state decisions

Relies on Williams v. State · Kirkman v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-02-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1John Olson appeals from sentences entered following the revocation of Ms probation and sentencing on the underlying charge and subsequent conviction on a separate charge. As entered, these sentences are to run consecutively; however, the written plea agreement contemplates concurrent sentences. TMs case is remanded with directions to either sentence the defendant in accordance with the written agreement or allow him the opportumty to withdraw Ms plea. Kirkman v. State, 559 So.2d 695 (Fla. 3d DCA)(sentence vacated and remanded when the trial court imposed a sentence other than that contemplated in the written plea agreement without explicitly giving the defendant the opportumty to withdraw the plea), review denied, 574 So.2d 143 (Fla.1990).

¶2Vacated and remanded.

/687/so2d/71 · .json · Public domain