Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 687 SW2D 489 - Rumph v. State

Rumph v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2018

7 state decisions

301985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chaffin v. Stynchcombe · Houston v. State · Cumbie v. State · Hankins v. State · Banks v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant’s complaint is premature. If appellant’s probation is revoked solely because of her failure to pay her fine and the state fails to demonstrate that she had the capability to pay, her complaint will then be ripe.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.