State v. Reese’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2017
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. Texas · Smith v. State · State v. Strickland · State v. Mitchell · State v. Goddard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he MACH-CR forms are not mandated for usage in the same sense that the MAI-CR forms of pattern criminal instructions are required. An indictment or information that does not follow an appropriate MACH-CR charge can nonetheless meet the standard set by the constitutions and rule. Error is not established nor presumed because the amended information did not follow MACH-CR ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hendren“A general allegation, similar to the one in question, is found in the current approved charge for felony murder, MACH-CR 13.06.... The gist of the offense was murder. The amended information gave the defendant fair notice of the crime of which he was convicted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ward v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.