Culinary And Service Employees Union, Afl-Cio Local 555 v. Hawaii Employee Benefit Administration, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
688 F.2d 1228 · 1982
Citation profile
29 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Agricultural Research and Technology Group Inc Hayes v. Palm Seedlings Partners (1990), Lk Comstock Company Inc v. United Engineers & Constructors Inc (1989)
29 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Arroyo v. United States · Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co. · Terket v. Lund
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where no notice of appeal from a post-judgment order awarding attorneys' fees is filed, the court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to review the order.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is the filing of a notice of appeal that invokes our jurisdiction and establishes the issues to be addressed. A timely notice of appeal from the judgment or order complained of is mandatory and jurisdictional. Where no notice of appeal from a postjudgment order [regarding] attorneys’ fees is filed, the court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to review the order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Whitaker v. Garcetti“the district court relies upon extrinsic evidence to interpret an ambiguous contract, that interpretation is a factual determination reversible only if the district court's construction is clearly erroneous or if the court applied an incorrect legal standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.