Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 688 F.2d 27 - Goar v. Civiletti

Goar v. Civiletti’s Empirical Analysis

688 F.2d 27 · 1982

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2006 · most notably McCarthy v. Madigan (1992), Del Raine v. Carlson (1987)

52 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

420198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McKart v. United States · Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla. · Patsy v. Florida International University · Brice v. Day

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Filings will not be accepted under the Administrative Remedy Procedure for tort claims ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[a]lthough the administrative apparatus could not award money damages . . ., administrative consideration of the possibility of corrective action and a record would have aided a court in measuring liability and determining the extent of the damages.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Administrative officials, therefore, do not have the authority to award monetary damages for tort claims against the government or against other officials.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.