Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 688 F.2d 377 - Junior v. Texaco, Inc.

Junior v. Texaco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

688 F.2d 377 · 1982

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
3
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently June 2009 · most notably Jett v. Dallas Independent School District (1986), Bozé v. Branstetter (1990)

26 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

250198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Pullman-Standard v. Swint · Israel Alicea Rosado v. Ramon Garcia Santiago · Bourque v. Powell Electrical Manufacturing Co. · Martha D. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... working conditions are so difficult or unpleasant that a reasonable person in the employee's shoes would feel compelled to resign.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Serbonian bog which appears to encircle ... a mixed question of fact and law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(a) that the employee was a member of a protected class; (b) that he was qualified for the job from which he was discharged; (c) that he was discharged; and (d)that the employer filled the position with a non-minority member after the discharge or retained a non-minority employee who had engaged in conduct similar to that for which the employee was terminated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.