Jensen v. Satran’s Empirical Analysis
688 F.2d 76 · 1982
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2004
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Santoni v. United States · Blanton v. General Electric Credit Corp. · Angrist v. United States · Lyon v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[S]uch a minimal involvement clearly was not such as to affect [his] objectivity as a member of the committee that heard the complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“sufficient to inform [Brown] of the evidence relied upon by the factfinders in reaching their decision to take disciplinary action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brown v. Frey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.