Spacek v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
688 F.3d 536 · 2012
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Martinez v. Mukasey · Davila-Mejia v. Mukasey · United States v. Bryant · United States v. Castillo-Rivera · Hing Sum v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e review the BIA's legal determinations de novo, but we accord 'substantial deference to the BIA's interpretation of the statutes and regulations it administers.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“adopted the findings or the reasoning of the [immigration judge], we also review the [immigration judge's] decision as part of the final agency action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.