Cook v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 federal appellate · 4 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “by demonstrating two things: (1) 'counsel in the initial-review collateral proceeding, where the claim should have been raised, was ineffective under the standards of Strickland ...' and (2) 'the underlying ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claim is a substantial one, which is to say that the prisoner must demonstrate that the claim has some merit.' " Cook v. Ryan , 688 F.3d 598 , 607 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting Martinez , 566 U.S. at 14 , 132 S.Ct. 1309 ); see Clabourne v. Ryan , 745 F.3d 362 , 377 (9th Cir. 2014), overruled on other grounds by McKinney v. Ryan , 813 F.3d 798 (9th Cir. 2015). B. Evidentiary Development A habeas petitioner is not entitled to discovery "as a matter of ordinary course.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Roseberry v. Ryan · 327 F. Supp. 3d 1157 - Jones v. Ryan

2. “to the rule announced in Coleman . Under Martinez , a petitioner may establish cause for the procedural default of an ineffective assistance claim”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Roseberry v. Ryan