Klein v. Amfac, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Relies on Libhart v. Santa Monica Dairy Co. · Tri-cities Newspapers, Inc. v. Tri-Cities Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Local 349 · General Atomic Co. v. United Nuclear Corp. · Local Union Plumbers Pipefitters Industry Journeymen Apprentices Training Fund v. Ja Jones Construction Company · Kanzelberger v. F Kanzelberger G J
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For an action to be removable ... it must meet the statutory requirements as of the time the removal petition is filed and as of the time of the commencement of the action in state court. Thus, both at the time the action is filed and when it is removed, complete diversity must exist and none of the defendants may be a citizen of the forum state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.