688 F. Supp. 2d 576 - PADALECKI v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Thomas v. Arn · Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n · Greenspan v. Shalala · Hames v. Heckler · Villa v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'at most, slightly restricted by his mental impairment in his activities of daily living.’ ” Id., at 392 . As in this case, the Loza ALJ’s nonseverity language allowed for some effect on the individual's ability to work and omitted the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wichman v. Astrue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.