State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2012
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gore v. State · Bond v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he language of the statute does not support this construction. [Indiana Code Section] 35-46-l-5(a) makes only one reference as to whom the support is owed: “the person’s dependent child.” Since the legislature declined to mention the term “children” with regard to the Class “C” felony, it is not appropriate to incorporate the word here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sanjari v. State“the language of the statute does not support this construction” and that, to prove one Class C felony, the State had to show that the defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sickels v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.