Floyd v. State

¶1AFFIRMED. State v. Whitfield, 487 So.2d 1045 (Fla.1986) (sentencing errors which do not produce an illegal sentence or an unauthorized departure from the sentencing guidelines still require a contemporaneous objection if they are to be preserved for appeal), receded from on other grounds, Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995); Pope v. State, 646 So.2d 827 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (defendant who failed to present argument to trial court for review and ruling was precluded from raising issue on appeal).