Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 688 SO2D 256 - Carpenter v. Davis

Carpenter v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Blue Ridge Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Transportation (2000), 827 So. 2d 104 - Ex Parte Awtrey Realty Co., Inc. (2001)

32 state decisions

240199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fincher v. Robinson Bros. Lincoln-Mercury · Laney v. Early · Hall v. Gulledge · Lange v. Scofield · DAUPHIN ISLAND, ETC. v. Kuppersmith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A summary judgment is appropriate upon a showing that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. In reviewing a summary judgment, [an appellate court] will view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and will resolve all reasonable doubts against the moving party. “The facts in this case are undisputed; therefore, we will review the trial court’s application of the law to those facts to determine whether the [Board was] entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The facts in this case are undisputed; therefore, we will review the trial court's application of the law to those facts to determine whether the plaintiffs were entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “there is no inconsistency or ambiguity within a restrictive covenant, the clear and plain language of the covenant is enforceable by injunctive relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.