Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 688 SO2D 383 - McBean v. State

McBean v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2012

8 state decisions

60199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jenkins v. Anderson · 576 So. 2d 281 - State v. Williams · 563 So. 2d 622 - Joint Ventures, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp. · 480 So. 2d 1291 - Gage v. State · 500 So. 2d 540 - Florida Bar v. Stahl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that a witness may be impeached by a prior inconsistent statement, including an omission in a previous out-of-court statement about which the witness testifies at trial, if it is material and would naturally have been mentioned.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Whether a witness is qualified as an expert is a determination within the sound discretion of the trial court, whose decision will not be reversed on appeal without a clear showing of error or clear abuse of discretion. Likewise, the range of subjects about which an expert may testify in a particular trial is a matter within the trial court's discretion. Although a trial court's decision on the qualifications of an expert ordinarily is conclusive, an appellate court can come to the opposite conclusion when it determines the trial court reached its decision by applying erroneous legal principles. " [c.o., emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.