Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 688 So. 2d 39 - State v. Eisbruckner

688 So. 2d 39 - State v. Eisbruckner’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2011

4 state decisions

20199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Baskett v. United States · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · Baker v. Wade · 372 So. 2d 1024 - State v. Hatcher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under State v. Prieur, 277 So.2d 126 (La.1973), and Art. 404B, the basic criteria for introduction of evidence of other crimes, as correctly stated by the trial judge, is (1) the evidence is not merely repetitive and cumulative, (2) the evidence is introduced for a relevant purpose and is not a subterfuge for depicting the defendant's bad character and (3) the evidence serves the actual purpose for which it is offered. See also State v. Hatcher, 372 So.2d 1024 (La.1979). Here, we cannot say the trial judge erred. Eisbruckner's inclination to intentionally set things on fire when upset or provoked was relevant to show he intended to and did in fact set fire to Mrs. Geoghegan's house. Evidence of other crimes is allowed when the probative value outweighs its prejudicial effect. See State v. Hamilton, 478 So.2d 123 (La.1985), cert. denied at 478 U.S. 1022 , 106 S.Ct. 3339 , 92 L.Ed.2d 743 (1986).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.