Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

688 So. 2d 403

Docket No. 96-1881.

Brake v. Murphy

Eileen M. BRAKE, Appellant, v. Eve E. MURPHY, et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 12, 1997.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1997.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-02-12

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2000

3 state decisions

Relies on 687 So. 2d 842 - Brake v. Murphy

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-02-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert M. Brake, Coral Gables, for appellant.

¶2Richard T. Kozek, Jr., Miami, for appellees.

¶3Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.

¶4*404 PER CURIAM.

¶5We dispose of the several orders now on appeal in this interminable litigation as follows: (1) The order awarding attorney's fees for services performed in securing the judgment which has since been reversed in Brake v. Murphy,687 So.2d 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), is necessarily likewise reversed. (2) The order denying Rule 1.540 relief is affirmed. (3) The attempted review of a nonappealable order denying a motion for a more definite statement is dismissed. (4) The sua sponte order purporting to partially deprive Mrs. Brake of her share in the estate is reversed as both procedurally and substantively unauthorized.

¶6Affirmed in part, reversed in part, dismissed in part.

/688/so2d/403 · .json · Public domain