Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 688 SO2D 685 - State v. Vikesdal

State v. Vikesdal’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2003
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Delaware v. Prouse · Florida v. Bostick · United States v. Place · United States v. Jacobsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he seizure of the defendant's person here occurred without any reasonable suspicion or probable cause to believe that the defendant or anyone else on the bus had violated some law, in contravention of La. Const. art. 1, § 5 and La.C.Cr.P. art. 215.1. The marijuana obtained from Vikesdal's luggage as a result of this unlawful seizure is not legally admissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.