Dugard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
78 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably Romero v. State (1990), Drew v. State (1987)
78 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division · Lipsett Steel Products, Inc. v. Mosley · Sneed v. State · Stephenson v. State · Heredia v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) A motion for new tidal, if filed, shall be filed prior to or within 30 days after the date the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court. (b) One or more amended motions for new trial may be filed without leave of court before any preceding motion for new trial filed by the movant is overruled and within 30 days after the date the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lewis · Green v. State““The statutory method set forth in Article 40.05, as amended in 1981, does not provide for any amendment of the motion for new trial after the said 30 days, even with leave of court. This represents an intentional change of the former statute and requiring the filing and all amending of a motion for new trial within the said 30 days and not thereafter.” Dugard, 688 S.W.2d at 530 .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Drew v. State · State v. Mapp“By entering an order merely abating an appeal a court of appeals does not "decide a case” nor does it deliver "a written opinion.” Its decision in the case and the reason for that decision awaits outcome of whatever proceeding is to be had in the trial court, reflected in a supplemental record filed in the court of appeals. With that supplemental record before it the court of appeals may then decide the case with a written opinion giving the reason for its decision, after which the losing party is entitled to seek review by this Court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Williams v. State · Jack v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.