Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 689 F.2d 1150 - Magnesco Restaurants, Inc. v. Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips, Inc.

Magnesco Restaurants, Inc. v. Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

689 F.2d 1150 · 1982

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
4
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 11 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably Motorola, Inc. v. Computer Displays International, Inc. (1984), Miller ex rel. MM v. Mitchell (2010)

20 federal appellate · 11 district · 4 state decisions

21019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sampson v. Murray · McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co. · Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70 · Rodriguez v. United States · Krasnov v. Dinan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In appeals from the following orders or judgments, such notice of appeal shall be filed within 14 days (2 weeks) of the date of the entry of the order or judgment appealed from: (A) any interlocutory order granting, continuing, modifying, refusing, or dissolving an injunction, or refusing to dissolve or modify an injunction."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “At least where the restraining order has been in effect for many months and where there is no possibility of interfering with the district court's orderly disposition of a motion for a preliminary injunction, the rationale against reviewing a grant or denial of a temporary restraining order is absent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[ljook beyond terminology to the actual content, purport, and effect of that which may otherwise be described as a temporary restraining order or as a preliminary injunction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.