Stubbs v. Bordenkircher’s Empirical Analysis
689 F.2d 1205 · 1982
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2023 · most notably Perry v. Leeke (1989), Haney v. State (1991)
14 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Geders v. United States · United States v. Allen · Bailey v. Redman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[It] is one thing to say that a defendant who has been deprived of the guiding hand of counsel need not demonstrate the prejudicial effect of that deprivation; it is quite another to say that he need not show that the challenged order deprived him of counsel he would otherwise have received."”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that he desired to consult with his attorney, and would have consulted with him but for the restriction placed upon him by the trial judge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.