United States v. Mattox’s Empirical Analysis
689 F.2d 531 · 1982
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably United States v. Ladum (1998), United States v. Maldonado (1984)
17 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Bronston v. United States · United States v. Irwin · United States v. Perez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Leaving a blank is equivalent to an answer 'none' or a statement that there are no facts required to be reported.... If there are facts that should be reported, leaving a blank belies the certification ... that the information therein is true and correct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Silence may be falsity when it misleads, particularly if there is a duty to speak.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.