Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 689 F.2d 54 - United States v. Graewe

United States v. Graewe’s Empirical Analysis

689 F.2d 54 · 1982

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably United States v. Delker (1985), United States v. Acevedo-Ramos (1985)

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

23019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1510 · 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (Bail Reform Act of 1984)

Relies on Stack v. Boyle · Wood v. Georgia · Hudson v. Parker · Gumbel v. Pitkin · J. I. Case Co. v. Borak

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court’s interest in efficient criminal prosecution and the gathering of witnesses demands precautions to ensure that the proceedings move expeditiously and in accordance with due process. The extension of inherent powers to deny bail during trial to the pre-trial period recognizes that unless the witnesses are protected before trial they and their testimony will not be available at trial. It also recognizes that the court’s interests in the integrity of its own processes and the fair administration of justice are not confined to trial but to all proceedings. By protecting witnesses before trial through a defendant’s detention, the court is encouraging those witnesses and other potential witnesses to come forward and provide information helpful to the implementation of justice.” Id.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.