Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 689 F.2d 759 - United States v. Stuart

United States v. Stuart’s Empirical Analysis

689 F.2d 759 · 1982

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2009

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

110198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Frisbie v. Collins · Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Newman Oil Co. · United States v. National Bank · Ker v. People of the State of Illinois · Dames & Moore v. Regan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “counting days elapsed before trial, we exclude the 16-day period from July 14, 1981, to July 30, 1981. The record on appeal shows that the continuance granted during this time was to allow defendant to obtain counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.