Teleguz v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis
689 F.3d 322 · 2012
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Schlup v. Delo · Herrera v. Collins · Calderon v. Thompson · House v. Bell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“demonstrate that the totality of the evidence would prevent any reasonable juror from finding him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, such that his incarceration is a miscarriage of justice. If a petitioner passes through the Schlup gateway by satisfying this standard, the district court then considers and reaches the merits of all of the petitioner's procedurally defaulted claims.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Finch v. McKoy · Hayes v. Carver“Courts have consistently emphasized that actual innocence for the purposes of Schlup is a procedural mechanism rather than a substantive claim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Finch v. McKoy · Hayes v. Carver“the district court is not bound by the rules of admissibility that would govern at trial”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Finch v. McKoy · Hayes v. Carver
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.