Lavin v. Husted’s Empirical Analysis
689 F.3d 543 · 2012
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Buckley v. Valeo · Spencer v. Kemna · Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. · Randall v. Sorrell · Carey v. Wolnitzek
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“concede[d] that he ha[d] no evidence at all in support of his theory that [the statute] prevented] actual or perceived corruption among prosecutors in Ohio.” Id. at 547 (emphasis added): As we discuss in the text, that is emphatically not the situation here. See also id. (distinguishing Green Party on the ground that there the state did have evidence”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“refused to accept their contributions, citing Ohio law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schickel v. Dilger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.