Sherley v. Sebelius’s Empirical Analysis
689 F.3d 776 · 2012
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 289G · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Udall v. Tallman · Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Mead Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[t]he failure to respond to comments is significant only insofar as it demonstrates that the agency's decision was not based on a consideration of the relevant factors.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the opportunity to comment is meaningless unless the agency responds to significant points raised by the public”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.